• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • Browse Issues
    • Browse Subjects
    • Browse Keywords
    • Browse Authors
  • Submit Paper
  • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Staff
    • Peer Review Process
    • Related Links
    • Facts & Figures
  • Guide for Authors
  • Contact Us
  • Register
  • Login

Advanced Search
Reduce Font Increase Font
Home Articles Article Details
Print
  • Recommend Journal Recommend
  • |
  • Alert E-Alert
  • |
  • Order JournalOrder Journal
  • |
  • Track Your ArticleTrack your article
    Abstracting/Indexing   
      p-ISSN: 1735-1472
    
e-ISSN: 1735-2630
    
    (In Press)
Volume 10 (2013)
Volume 9 (2012)
Volume 8 (2011)
Volume 7 (2010)
Volume 6 (2009)
Volume 5 (2008)
Volume 4 (2007)
Volume 3 (2006)
Volume 2 (2005)
Volume 1 (2004)
Comparison of biostimulation and bioaugmentation for remediation of soil contaminated with spent motor oil
Article 18: Volume 8, Number 1, Winter 2011, Pages 187-194 (8) XML PDF (199 K)
Authors
S. Abdulsalam; I. M. Bugaje; S. S. Adefila; S. Ibrahim
Abstract
Aerobic fixed bed bioreactors were used to study and compare biostimulation and bioaugmentation for remediation of soil contaminated with spent motor oil. Bioaugmentation using consortium of bacteria and biostimulation using inorganic fertilizer and potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate were investigated. The bioremediation indicators used were the oil and grease content removals, total heterotrophic bacteria counts and carbon dioxide respiration rates. Results showed that biodegradations were very effective with 50, 66 and 75 % oil and grease content removal efficiencies for control, bioaugmentation and biostimulation respectively after ten weeks. Carbon dioxide respiration followed similar pattern as the oil and grease content removals. Biostimulation option has the highest carbon dioxide generation (6 249 mg/kg) and the control with the least (4 276 mg/kg). Therefore, the biostimulation option can be used to develop a realistic treatment technology for soils contaminated with spent motor oil.
Keywords
Bacterial count; Bioremediation; Carbon dioxide respiration; Closed system; Fixed bed bioreactor; Oil and grease content
Main Subjects
Bioaugmentation; Biostimulation; Soil remediation; Motor oil
Related Articles in IJEST Publication by Main Subject
  • Remediation of soil co-contaminated with pyrene and cadmium by growing maize (Zea mays L.)
  • Response surface methodology approach to the optimization of oil hydrocarbon polluted soil remediation using enhanced soil washing
  • Sulphate reducing bacteria to precipitate mercury after electrokinetic soil remediation
References
1. Abdulsalam, S.; Omale, A. B., (2009). Comparison of biostimulation and bioaugmentation techniques for the remediation of used motor oil contaminated soil. Braz. Arch. Biol. Tech., 52 (3), 747-754 (8 Pages), DOI: 10.1590/S1516-89132009000300027.. Full Text (79 K)
2. Adams, P.; Jackson, P. P., (1996). Bioremediation of oil spills: Theory and practice.. International Bioremediation Services Limited, Westgate, Aldridge, West Midlands, , 1-17 (17 Pages)
3. Amund, O. O.; Adewale, A. A.; Ugogi, E. O., (1987). Occurrence and characteristics of hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria in Nigerian soils contaminated with spent motor oil. Indian J. Microbiol. 27 (1), 63-67 (5 Pages)
4. Anoliefo, G. O.; Edegbai, B. O., (2000). Effect of spent engine oil as a oil contaminant on the growth of two eggplant species; Solanum melongena L. and S. incanum. J. Agric. Forestry Fisheries. 1 (1), 21-25 (5 Pages) Abstract | Full Text
5. ASTM (1982). Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water Content of Soil, Rock and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures. American Society for Testing and Materials: D 2216, Abstract
6. ASTM (1982). Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Particle Size Analysis of Soil, Rock and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures. American Society for Testing and Materials: D 422-63, Abstract
7. Atlas, R. M.; Cerniglia, C. E., (1995). Bioremediation of pollutants: Diversity and environmental aspects of hydrocarbon biodegradation. Biosci., 45 (1), 332-338 (7 Pages) Abstract
8. Bagherzadeh-Namazi, A.; Shojaosadati, S. A.; Hashemi-Najafabadi, S., (2008). Biodegradation of used engine oil using mixed and isolated cultures. Int. J. Environ. Res., 2 (4), 431-440 (10 Pages). Full Text (491 K)
9. Bailey, J. E.; Ollis, D. F., (1977). Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals. International Student edition. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd, Tokyo, , 335-356 (22 Pages) Abstract
10. Bates, R. A., (1954). Electrometric determination. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, . Full Text
11. Brady, N. C.; Weil, R. R., (1999). The nature and properties of soil., 12th Edition. Prentice-Hall Inc, U.S.A, , 145 Abstract
12. Buchanan, R. E.; Gibbons, N. E., (1974). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 8th Edition.. N. E. The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore, . Full Text
13. Chaineau, C. H.; Setier, J. C.; Morillon, A., (2002). Is bioremediation s solution for the treatment of oily waste. SPE 78548, Soc. Petrol Eng. Inc. , 1-10 (10 Pages)
14. Chambers, D. C.; Willis, J.; Giti-Pour, S.; Zieleniewiski, L.J.; Rickabaugh, J.F.; Mecca, M. I.; Pasin, B.; Sims, C. R.; Sorensen, L. D.; Sims, L. J.; Mclean, E. J.; Mahmood, R.; Dupont, R. R.; Wagner, K., (1991). In-situ treatment of hazardous waste contaminated soil., 2nd Edition. Noyes Data Corporation New Jersey, U.S.A, , 44-64 (21 Pages) Abstract
15. Chukwuma, M. C.; Eshett, E. T.; Onweremadu, E. U.; Okon, M. A., (2010). Zinc availability in relation to selected soil properties in a crude oil polluted eutric tropofluvent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7 (2), 261-270 (10 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (1066 K)
16. Dhanasekaran, D.; Thajuddin N.; Rashmi, M.; Deepika, T. L.; Gunasekaran M., (2009). Screening of biofouling activity in marine bacterial isolate from ship hull. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (2), 197-202 (6 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (108 K)
17. Forsyth, J. V.; Tsao, Y. H.; Bleam, R. D., (1995). Bioremediation: When is bioaugmentation needed?, 1-14. in R. E. Hinchee, J. Fredrickson and B. C. Alleman (Ed.). Bioremediation for site remediation. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, USA,
18. Fouépé, T. A.; Kengni, T. L.; Gurunadha Rao, V. V. S.; Ndam, N. J. R., (2009). Transfer of moisture through the unsaturated zone in the tropical forest using the neutron probe. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (3), 379-388 (10 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (286 K)
19. Igwe, J. C.; Abia, A. A.; Ibeh, C. A., (2008). Adsorption kinetics and intraparticulate diffusivities of Hg, As and Pb ions on unmodified and thiolated coconut fiber. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5 (1), 83-92 (10 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (198 K)
20. Irvine, D. A. and Frost, H. L., (2003). Bioremediation of soils contaminated with industrial wastes: a report on the state –of-the-art in bioremediation. SBR Technology Inc., . Full Text
21. Kiyohara, H.; Takizawa, N.; Nagao, K., (1992). Natural distribution of bacteria metabolizing many kinds of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 74 (1), 49-51 (3 Pages)
22. Kosteck, P. T.; Calabrese, E. J., (1991). Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils: The Microbial Ecology Approach. In Hydrocarbon contaminated soils and Groundwater. Lewis Publishers, Inc. United States, 1 (1), 203-238 (36 Pages)
23. Less, Z. M.; Senior, E., (1995). Bioremediation. A Practical Solution to Land Pollution: In Clean Technology and the Environment. Chapman and Hall, New York, , 121-146 (26 Pages). Full Text
24. Malakootian, M.; Nouri, J.; Hossaini, H., (2009). Removal of heavy metals from paint industry’s wastewater using Leca as an available adsorbent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (2), 183-190 (8 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (95 K)
25. Nnamchi, C. I.; Obeta, J. A. N.; Ezeogu, L. I., (2006). Isolation and characterization of some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degrading bacteria from Nsukka soils in Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 3 (2), 181-190 (10 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (147 K)
26. Nwuche, C. O.; Ugoji, E. O., (2008). Effects of heavy metal pollution on the soil microbial activity. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5 (3), 409-414 (6 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (82 K)
27. Nwuche, C. O.; Ugoji, E. O., (2010). Effect of co-existing plant specie on soil microbial activity under heavy metal stress. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7 (4), 697-704 (8 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (1214 K)
28. Prenafeta-Boldu, X. F.; Kuhn, A.; Dmam, L.; Anke, H.; Van-Groenestijn, J. W.; De Bent J., (2001). Isolation and characterization of fungi growing on volatile aromatic hydrocarbons as their sole carbon and energy source. Mycol. Res., 4 (1), 477-484 (8 Pages)
29. Refaat, A. A., (2010). Different techniques for the production of biodiesel from waste vegetable oil. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7 (1), 183-213 (31 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (1786 K)
30. Shah, B. A.; Shah, A. V.; Singh, R. R., (2009). Sorption isotherms and kinetics of chromium uptake from wastewater using natural sorbent material. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (1), 77-90 (14 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (506 K)
31. Vidali, M., (2001). Bioremediation: An overview. J. Appl. Chem., 73 (7), 1163-1172 (10 Pages)
32. Vu-Duc, T.; Huynh, C. K.; Lafontaine, M.; Bonnet, P.; Binet, S., (2002). A Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Organic Soluble Matter in Bitumen Fumes. Appl. Occupational Environ. Hygiene, 17 (7), 495-500 (6 Pages), DOI: 10.1080/10473220290035732. Abstract | Full Text
33. Yerushalmi, L.; Rocheleau, S.; Cimpoia, R..; Sarrazin, M.; Sunahara, G.; Peisajovich, A.; Leclair, G.; Guiot, R.S., (2003). Enhanced bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soil. Bioremed. J., 7 (1), 37-51 (15 Pages), DOI: 10.1080/713914241-274. Abstract | Full Text
34. Yousefi Kebria, D.; Khodadadi, A.; Ganjidoust, H.; Badkoubi, A.; Amoozegar, M. A., (2009). Isolation and characterization of a novel native Bacillus strain capable of degrading diesel fuel. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (3), 435-442 (8 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (146 K)
35. Zhang, H.; Dang, Z.; Zheng, L. C.; Yi, X. Y., (2009). Remediation of soil co-contaminated with pyrene and cadmium by growing maize (Zea mays L.). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (2), 69-76 (8 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (162 K)

Home | About Us | Sitemap | News | Glossary | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact Us

© 2004 - 2013 IAU. All rights reserved.

Top of Page