• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • Browse Issues
    • Browse Subjects
    • Browse Keywords
    • Browse Authors
  • Submit Paper
  • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Staff
    • Peer Review Process
    • Related Links
    • Facts & Figures
  • Guide for Authors
  • Contact Us
  • Register
  • Login

Advanced Search
Reduce Font Increase Font
Home Articles Article Details
Print
  • Recommend Journal Recommend
  • |
  • Alert E-Alert
  • |
  • Order JournalOrder Journal
  • |
  • Track Your ArticleTrack your article
    Abstracting/Indexing   
      p-ISSN: 1735-1472
    
e-ISSN: 1735-2630
    
    (In Press)
Volume 10 (2013)
Volume 9 (2012)
Volume 8 (2011)
Volume 7 (2010)
Volume 6 (2009)
Volume 5 (2008)
Volume 4 (2007)
Volume 3 (2006)
Volume 2 (2005)
Volume 1 (2004)
Genotype and environment interaction effect on yield of cotton under naturally salt stress condition
Article 11: Volume 2, Number 2, Summer 2005, Pages 169-174 (6) XML PDF (64 K)
Authors
Y. Ali; Z. Aslam; F. Hussain
Abstract
Thirteen genotypes of cotton developed through hybridization and mutation breeding techniques were evaluated during two consecutives years 2002-03-04 on eight locations covering most of the area of Punjab province including Faisalabad, Toba Tek Singh and Jhang. The eight sets of experiments were conducted in the naturally highly saline sodic soils, EC ranges from 7.8-36.1 d/Sm, pH=8.1-8.8, SAR=10.1-40.5, Saturation percentage 31.3-40.8 and texture Sandy Clay loam and Clay loam. The seed yield data was collected at maturity and stability parameters were computed to know genotypic environment interaction and varietals performance. The combined analysis of variance showed highly significant variance in case of varieties, locations and varieties x environment (Lin) also showed highly significant differences. It means that genotypes exhibited different behavior in different locations/environments which is due to their different genetic make up. The behavior may be cross over (in which significant change in ranking order occurs from one environment to another) or cross over nature (in which case the ranking of genotypes remains constant across environments and the interaction is significant because of change in the magnitude of response) depending upon the ranking order of genotypes performance under different environments. In our study only S-12 behavior was of almost non cross over nature, while others had cross over type of interaction. Based on over all seed yield cotton variety NIAB-999 and CIM-707 produced highest seed yield cotton (3.2 t/ha, 3.17t/ha). The lowest seed yield cotton was noted in S-12 (1.86 t/ha). All the three parameters of stability i.e. overall mean seed yield cotton, regression coefficient and standard deviation to regression provided clear evidence that variety NIAB-999 and CIM-707 produced maximum stable yield compared to S-12.
Keywords
Cotton; Environmental interaction; Genotypes; Salinity; Stability
Main Subjects
Cotton; Environmental interaction; Genotypes; Salinity; Stability
Related Articles in IJEST Publication by Main Subject
  • Economic sensitivity of Persian Gulf salinity variations due to tidal effects
  • Evaluation of twenty four new Gossypium hirsutum strains for growth, yield, fibre quality and ClCuV resistance under environment of Punjab, Pakistan
  • Genotypic and environmental interaction in advanced lines of rice under salt-affected soils of Punjab
  • Genotypic and environmental interaction in advanced lines of wheat under salt-affected soils environment of Punjab
Related Articles in IJEST Publication by Reference
  • Genotype and environmental interaction in cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata-L) for yield and disease resistance
  • Genotypic and environmental interaction in advanced lines of rice under salt-affected soils of Punjab
  • Genotypic and environmental interaction in advanced lines of wheat under salt-affected soils environment of Punjab
References
1. Ahmad, J., M. H. Chaudhry, S. Salah-ud-Din and M. A. Ali, (1996). Stability for grain yield in wheat. Pak. J. Bot., 28 (1), 61-65 (5 Pages) Abstract
2. Akhtar, J. J. Gorham, R. H. Qureshi and M. Aslam. (1998). Dose tolerance of wheat to salinity and hypoxia come late with root dehydrogenize activities or parenchyma formation?. plant soil. 201 (2), 275-284 (10 Pages), DOI: 10.1023/A:1004333318973. Abstract | Full Text (126 K)
3. Akhtar, J., J. Gorham and R. H., Qureshi. amphiploids. (1994). Combined effect of salinity and hypoxia in wheat (Triticum aesitivum L) and wheat-Thinopyrum amphiploids. Plant soil 166 (1), 47-54 (8 Pages), DOI: 10.1007/BF02185480. Abstract | Full Text (650 K)
4. Ali, Y., Z. Aslam, F. Hussain and A. Shakur, (2004). Genotypic and environmental interaction in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) for yield and disease resistance. Internal. J. Environ. Sci. Tech, 1 (2), 127-131 (5 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (89 K)
5. Anonymous, (2003). Agricultural statistics of Pakistan. Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Live Stock, Economic Wing, Islamabad, (83-84),
6. Ashraf, M. and S. Ahmad, ) (2000). Influence of sodium chloride on ion accumulation, yield components and fiber characteristics in salt tolerant and salt sensitive lines of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field crops res., 66 (2), 115-127 (13 Pages), DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00064-2. Abstract | Full Text (670 K)
7. Baker, R. J., (1988). Test for crossover genotype–environmental interactions. Can. J. Plant Sci., 68, 405-410 (6 Pages)
8. Bhatti, H. M. and M. Rashid, (1980). Role of soil factors in cotton production. A review. The Pak. Cotton. 24, 183-192 (10 Pages)
9. Blum, A. (1983). Genetic and physiological relationship in plant breeding for drought resistance. In: Plant production and management under drought conditions (Eds.). J. T.Stone and W. O. Willis. Elsevier Amsterdam., , 195-205 (11 Pages)
10. Bull, J. K., M. Cooper, I. H. Delacy, K. E. Bassford and D. R. Woodruff, (1992). Utility of repeated checks for hierarchical classification of data from plant breeding trials. Field Crop Res., 30 (1-2), 79-95 (17 Pages), DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(92)90058-H. Abstract | Full Text (1156 K)
11. Eberhart, S. and W. A. Russell., (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6, 36-40 (5 Pages) Abstract | Full Text
12. Glenn. E. R. Pfister, J. J. Brown, T. L. Thompson, J. W. O. Leary, (1996). Na and K accumulation and salt tolerance of Atriplex canescens (Chenopodiaceae) genotypes. Am. J. Bot., 83 (8), 997-1005 (9 Pages) Abstract | Full Text
13. Golmirzaie, A. M., J. W. Schmidt and A. F. Dreier., (1990). Components of variance and stability parameters in studies of cultivars x environment interaction in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Research Communications., 18, 249-256 (8 Pages)
14. Gratten, S. R. and C. M. Grieve., (1992). Mineral element acquisition and growth response of plant grown in saline environments. Agri. Ecosystems Environ,. 38 (4), 275-300 (26 Pages), DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(92)90151-Z. Abstract | Full Text (2710 K)
15. Helms, T. C., (1993). Selection for yield and stability among oat lines. Crop Sci., 33, 423-426 (4 Pages) Abstract | Full Text
16. Khan, A. N., (1987). Mechanisms of salt tolerance in cotton. PhD. Thesis, Dept. soil Sci, Univ. Agric. Faisalabad, Pakistan,
17. Khan, I. A., B. A. Malik and M. Bashir., (1988). Investigation of genotype x environment interaction for seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pak. J. Bot., 20, 201-204 (4 Pages)
18. Khan, I. A., B. A. Malik and M. Tahir., (1987). Phenotypic stability for yield in chickpea. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 309, 455-456 (2 Pages)
19. Kinyua, M. G., (1992). Genotype x environment effects on bread wheat grown over multiple locations and years in Kenya. In: 7th. regional wheat workshop for Eastern, Central and Southern Africa Nakuru Kenya., , 103-107 (5 Pages)
20. Liu, L. X., T. C. Haung, G. T. L. Liu and S. Z. Zhang.m., (1992). Stability analysis of yield and quality characters of hybrid and pure line winter wheat cultivars. Acta. Agronomica Sinica., 18, 38-49 (12 Pages)
21. Maas, E. V. and G. J. Hoffman., (1977). Crop salt tolerance current assessment. J. Irrig. Drainage Div., 103, 115-134 (20 Pages) Abstract | Full Text (1 K)
22. Maas, E. V., (1993). Salinity and citriculture. Tree physiol., 12 (2), 195-216 (22 Pages), DOI: 10.1093/treephys/12.2.195. Abstract | Full Text (3852 K)
23. Maas, E. V., (1986). Salt tolerance of plants. App. Agric. Res., 1, 12-26 (15 Pages)
24. Matus, A., A. E. Slinkard and C. V. Kessel, (1997). Genotype x environment interaction for carbon isotope discrimination in spring wheat. . Crop Sci., 37, 97-102 (6 Pages) Abstract | Full Text
25. Qadir, M. and M. Shams., (1997). Some agronomic and physiological aspects of salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Agron. Crop sci., 179 (2), 101-106 (6 Pages) Abstract | Full Text
26. Qari, M. S., N. I. Khan and M. A. Bajwa., (1990). Comparison of wheat cultivars for stability in yield performance.. Pak. J. Agri. Res., 11, 73-77 (5 Pages)
27. Qayyum, M. A. and D. Malik., (1988). Farm production losses in salt affected soils. In managing soil resources proc. 1st. Nat. Cong on soil Sci., Lahore, Pakistan, , 356-364 (9 Pages) Abstract
28. Rehman, S., P. J. C. Harris and W. E. Bourne., (1998). The effect of sodium chloride on the Ca++, K+ and Na+ concentration of the seed coat and embryo of Acacia tortilis and A. cortacea.. Ann. Appl. Biol., 133, 269-279 (11 Pages)
29. Saqib, M., R. H. Qureshi, J Akhtar, S. Nawaz and M. Aslam., (1999). Effect of salinity and hypoxia on growth and ionic compositions of different genotypes of wheat. Pak. J. Soil Sci., 17, 1-8 (8 Pages)
30. Sarwar, G., M. S. Sadiq, M. Saleem and G. Abbas./ (2003). Genotype x environment interaction in newly developed lentil germplasm under cotton based cropping system.. Proc. of Seminar “Sustainable utilization of plant genetic resources for agricultural production”, 2002, NARC Islamabad., , 219-226 (8 Pages)
31. Sial, M. A., M. A. Arain and M. Ahmad., (2000). Genotype x environment interaction on bread wheat grown over multiple sites and years in Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 32, 85-91 (7 Pages), DOI: 1. Abstract
32. Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie., (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc. New York., Abstract
33. Yadav, R. S. and P. S. Tomar., (1985). Protein content and stability in black gram. Ind. J. Agri. Sci., 55, 510-512 (3 Pages)

Home | About Us | Sitemap | News | Glossary | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact Us

© 2004 - 2013 IAU. All rights reserved.

Top of Page