Noopept and Aniracetam are among the most widely-used nooropics in the world. Both of these synthetic “smart drugs” are used by thousands of students, traders, programmers and gamers ever single day to dramatically improve cognitive performance.
There’s a very good reason for this; these nootropis work!
Both Noopept and Aniracetam have powerful nootropic effects, from sharper focus and greater concentration to more rapid information processing and better working memory.
But these two nootropics are definitely not the same. There are actually huge differences between Aniracetam and Noopept, both in terms of how they work, their side effect risks, and their overall efficacy.
So which is better, Noopept or Aniracetam?
In a one-on-one showdown of Noopept vs Aniracetam, which nootropic comes out on top?
Let’s go through the main benefits, side effects, and mechanisms of action of Noopept and Aniracetam to see which nootropic is better.
Noopept and Aniracetam: Similarities
Noopept and Aniracetam have a lot of similarities, mostly in terms of the subjective effects they produce in users.
Both nootropics are known to broadly improve cognitive performance across a number of different measures.
Studies have shown that Aniracetam enhances verbal acuity, visual recognition, reaction times, information processing speeds, motor performance, and focus. In other words, it enhances every aspect of executive cognitive function.
Some studies have also found that Aniracetam is effective for improving memory in older people with mild cognitive impairment, but this needs further study before it is accepted as a proven benefit of Aniracetam.
Noopept is also known to enhance cognitive performance in a very broad sense. Studies show that Noopept consumption rapidly improves working memory, focus, clarity, and verbal acuity.
The difference between Noopept and Aniracetam in terms of effects is that Aniracetam primarily enhances executive cognitive functioning, while Noopept improves brain performance more generally, touching everything from memory and focus to mood and anxiety resistance. But both nootropics are broad in their effects.
Another similarity between Noopept and Aniracetam is that they both work very quickly after taking your first dose; most people will feel the effects of Aniracetam and Noopept almost instantly.
Noopept vs Aniracetam: Mechanism of action
Noopept and Aniracetam have completely different mechanisms of action, which is why they have slightly different effects , and why their effects last for different lengths of time.
Noopept primarily works by invcreasing the expression of Brain Derived Neuritrophic Factor (BDNF) in the brain. BDNF governs the growth, proliferaton, and maintenance of neurons. More BDNF means more neuron growth and more efficienct neuron maintenance, whih means more raw brain processing power, better memory recall and storage, and better overall brain health.
Aniracetam works quite differently to Noopept. Rather than focusing on boosting neurogenesis, Aniracetam works by altering the way neurotransmitters in the brain behave.
Specifically, Aniracetam is thought to work by stimulating AMPA receptors. AMPA receptors regulate fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system; in simple terms, they control the flow of signals flowing between neurons.
By stimulating AMPA receptors, Aniracetam greatly increases the flow of neurotransmitters passing between neurons, which in turn drastically increases brain activity. This results in massive improvements in focus, concentration, learning, information processing, and mental energy.
While Aniracetam typically has more short-term effects than Noopept, there is some evidence that Aniracetam may potentiate AMPA receptors over the long-term (aka long-term potentiation). It is thought that Aniracetam may therefore enhance cognition over the long-term. However, this needs much further study. As it stands, a major difference between Noopept and Aniracetam is that Noopept has much longer-lasting effects than Aniracetam.
So in the fight of Noopept vs Aniracetam, Noopept wins in terms of effects simply due to the fact that its benefits are much longer lasting, and they are also more general in nature.
Aniracetam vs Noopept: Dosage
The main difference between Noopept and Aniracetam is the minimum active dose of these nootropics.
Aniracetam has a much larger minimum active dose than Noopept. In fact, Aniracetam has a larger active dose than Noopept by an order of magnitude!
The lowest dose of Noopept you can take and experience significant benefits is about 15mg. The standard dose of Noopept used by most people is 20mg, with some users taking up to 30mg, although this dose is excessively large and doesn’t produce more benefits than 20mg.
Aniracetam, by contrast, is typically consumed in doses of 750mg and up. The minimum active dose of Aniracetam is 500mg; consuming doses below 500mg is generally not going to produce any meaningful benefits.
So in Aniracetam vs Noopept, Noopept wins on dosing. However, if you don’t mind having to take larger quantities of a nootropic, this factor doesn’t really make much of a difference.
Aniracetam vs Noopept: Side Effects
Which is safer, Noopept or Aniracetam?
In any Noopept vs Aniracetam comparison, this is probably the most important factor to consider. While fw people consider this aspect of choosing the right nootropic, it is extremely important that you consider the side effect risks of both Aniracetam and Noopept before using either of them!
Neither Noopept nor Aniracetam are thought to pose any serious health and safety risks.
Both of these nootropics are used by people on a regular basis, and users do not typically report experiencing side effects from either Aniracetam or Noopept.
When side effects do occur, they are typicall ymild and transient. Noopept and Aniracetam share the most frequently reported side effects, which include:
- Stomach cramps
- Low mood
- Loss of motivation
- Poor cognitive function
There are no known long-term side effect risks from frequent use of either Aniracetam or Noopept.
However, this is more due to the fact that long-term use of these nootropics has not been prop[erly examined in the context of health and safety.
It is feasible that long-term use of either of these nootropics, particularly Aniracetam, may adversely affect brain function.
Aniracetam works by increasing the flow of signals between neurons. Over a long period of frequent use, this may degrade your neurons and cause minor damage (owing to the increased use). Clearly, more studies are needed to examine the long-term effects of both Aniracetam and Noopept.
It is vital that you do your research carefully before using any nootropics, especially nootropics like Aniracetam and Noopept that have no long-term studies verifying their safety. If you experience any side effects from these nootropics whatsoever, seek medical attention immediately.
Noopept vs Aniracetam: Which is better?
So which nootropic wins in Noopept vs Aniracetam?
Which is the better nootropic?
Well, there isn’t really a straight answer to this question. Noopept and Aniracetam have different mechanisms of action, and as a result, slightly different effects.
The benefits of Aniracetam are restricted to enhancing executive cognitive functions, such as information processing, verbal acuity, and muscle contraction. While there is some evidence that Aniracetam has long-term effects through AMPA receptor potetniation, but this is yet to be proven conclusively.
Noopept, on the other hand, produces more less intense but much broader enhancements in cognitive function. It works by stimulating neuron growth and proliferation, which improves overall brain funciton in both the short and long-term. Noopept also appears to effectively reduce anxiety and bolster stress resistance.
So whether you should use Noopept or Aniracetam very much depends on what ytou want to achieved from nootropics.
Ultimately though, we think for 99% of people a high quality natural nootropic stack is the best option for enhancing total brain performance for the long-term.
Natural nootropic stacks like Mind Lab Pro do not have any of the same side effect or long-term health risks that you get from synthetic study drugs, but are just as effective. So you get all of the benefits, none of the downsides.
Paul Tardner is the Lead Author at IJEST.org. Paul is a former academic and research scientists. He now dedicates his time to his own research into natural biohacking, with a particular focus on cognitive enhancement.